The Big Three: Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism Dominate Layer 2
Layer 2 has consolidated around three giants processing nearly 90% of all transactions. Meet the networks winning the scaling race.
Arbitrum: The DeFi Powerhouse
Launched in August 2021, Arbitrum has emerged as the undisputed leader in Layer 2. With $16.63 billion in TVL as of late 2025, it commands the largest share of decentralized finance activity.
What makes Arbitrum dominant:
- Deepest liquidity pools for trading
- Over 60% of Layer 2 market share for DeFi
- Battle-tested security and reliability
- Strong developer ecosystem
If you’re trading DeFi tokens or yield farming, chances are you’re using Arbitrum.

Base: The Retail Champion
Coinbase’s Layer 2 network Base has exploded in growth, capturing over 60% of Layer 2 transactions in 2025. Its secret? Making crypto accessible to mainstream users.
Base’s advantages:
- Seamless integration with Coinbase accounts
- One-click fiat on-ramps
- Lowest barrier to entry for new users
- Strong focus on consumer apps and NFTs
Base’s “Onchain Summer” campaign brought 2.2 million new wallets to Layer 2—an 8x year-over-year increase.
Optimism: The Infrastructure Innovator
With $6 billion in TVL, Optimism pioneered the “Superchain” concept—a network of interconnected Layer 2s sharing security and liquidity.
Optimism’s unique approach:
- Modular development framework (OP Stack)
- Retroactive funding for ecosystem contributors
- Focus on public goods and developer tools
- Growing network of OP-based chains
The Bottom Line
| Arbitrum | Base | Optimism | |
| Creator | Offhchain Labs | Coinbase | OP Labs |
| TVL (USDbn) | ~17 | ~12 | ~2-3 |
| Pros | Largest DeFi liquidity, 60% L2 market share, battle-tested security, strong developer ecosystem | Easy Coinbase integration, lowest entry barrier, 60% of L2 transactions, strong consumer focus | OP Stack framework, Superchain interoperability, public goods funding, developer-friendly tools |
| Cons | Slower than competitors, higher fees than Base | Smaller DeFi ecosystem than Arbitrum, centralized control by Coinbase | Smaller TVL than rivals, less retail adoption, complex governance model |
For investors and users, the message is clear: stick with the big three. The Layer 2 wars have produced clear winners. These three networks aren’t just surviving—they’re thriving, with analysts predicting smaller L2s may become “zombie chains” by 2026.
One question that I have been pondering about the investments into Layer 2 is the monetisation opportunity associated with Layer 2. Now I am running through some hypothetical numbers here: estimate is projecting the aggregate TVL on Layer 2 can reasonably reach USD 1trillion by 2030e, and a reasonable monetisation rate (L2 operator revenue as a % of TVL) is 2-3% (through monetisation methods such as sequencer fees and MEV). In other words, that is a USD 1trillion * 2.5% = USD 25billion revenue opportunity (against USD 6-7billion annual revenue for Coinbase, and an estimated USD 10-50million for Offchain Labs and OP Labs). No wonder these players are spending billions to build out the Layer 2 infrastructure. [note: simply put sequencer fees are what users pay the Layer 2 “traffic controller” to put their transactions into blocks, and MEV is extra profit that comes from choosing a clever order for those transactions.]
In tomorrow’s final post, we’ll show you how to get started with Layer 2.